Thursday, August 24, 2017

A633.8.3.RB_BrianneGowens_How To Better Enable Leadership

Enabling Leadership at all Levels

According to George Mason University (2017), the term “Action Research” is defined as “inquiry or research in the context of focused efforts to improve the quality of an organization and its performance.” In other words, the type of research defined by teams at George Mason University is aimed at fixing a problem. One of the greats problems faced by organizations today is a lack of communication and collaborating throughout different layers of leadership. This problem becomes quite interesting when the perspectives of people at different levels within the organization are shared, which is exactly what I explored within my own team.

Interview with Superiors

Upon completion of three informal interviews of supervisors in my organization, I was somewhat shocked to hear how consistently they shared a perception of organizational harmony and thriving employee-manager relationships. One superior commented “we have great collaboration in this organization between managers and employees” (M. Basil, personal communications, 2017). When I asked the second leader how well they think our organization embraces upward leadership, this leader responded “very well!” (Andrews, A, Personal Communications, 2017). The final leader said that in this organization, they are proud of how quickly followers step up and take the leadership role both inside the team and outside of the team (T. Rozario, personal communications, 2017).

Interview with Subordinates

I couldn’t help but ask (to myself of course) – am I working in the same organization as these people?! At first I feared that my feelings were just an outlier, but the perspective of the followers was proven to be quite different upon my continued interviews. Compared to the responses of the management team in my organization, subordinates were generally much more hesitant to open-up during our informal interview/correspondence. When asked what the greatest challenge in the group was today, the consistent answer I received was an intimidation factor from leadership. As a result of this intimidation factor, many subordinates don’t feel comfortable offering their experiences or opinions.

This feedback is clear to see in team meetings, such as the weekly staff meeting. Employees sit stiffly around the conference room table with their pens and notebooks ready to go, but they all look towards the head of the table while the manager speaks for almost the entire hour. During this interview, on subordinate used strategy sessions as another example of a time his voice is not heard. Once a month our team meets to discuss negotiation strategy, and people are encouraged to share their own experiences so we can learn from each other. The problem with this, explained the interviewee, is that the manager typically does most of the talking. Also, since the manager attends, the employees don’t feel as comfortable talking about areas where they struggled in a specific negotiation. This means the employees are attempting to highlight their strengths in front of the manager instead of sharing helpful experiences with their peers.

Implications of the Interviews: Building a Better Organization

The initial implication of this interview is that we have a serious disconnect in the perceptions of leaders and followers. I will say, however, that there does seem to be a clear alignment within the leadership community and within the follower community – the two groups just don’t meet anywhere near the middle. In a way, I was comforted to receive the confirmation that most employees are seeing the same opportunities for change as I am. This didn’t comfort me because I wanted to know that my feelings are “popular” or “right.” Instead, this comforted me because it gave me hope that truly impactful change can be made in my organization.

I believe the key to building a better organization at my company is to help people understand the criticality of leadership at all levels. When organizations practice leadership at all levels, employees across the enterprise understand exactly what the organization is trying to accomplish, what they need to achieve as an individual contributor, and how to prepare for the unexpected (Obolensky, 2014). According to Lanng (2014):

Establishing an environment which offers employees in various levels with leadership opportunities opens the floor for a much more collaborative workspace resulting in a place where employees aren’t afraid to discuss ideas with each other, and in doing so present stronger, more well-thought-out ideas to higher-level management. This collaboration can prove critical when informed business decisions need to be made, increasing the likelihood of feedback and input from employees at all levels.

One of the easiest ways to help business leaders understand how critical two-way communication and complex adaptive leadership is to the company is to explain the correlation between skilled leaders, passionate followers, and a strong competitive advantage. According to Yates (2017), “skilled leaders are the driving force of successful businesses. They set and communicate the vision, motivate people and determine the tone for the culture. The difference they make can’t be underestimated.” Complex, adaptive leaders manage organizations with clear processes, flexible strategies, and advanced systems, which enables people to act quicker and more effectively (Obolensky, 2014).

Understanding My Role as a Change Agent

I am currently at a level within my organization that might just enable a better chance at having an impact. I am not a manager, so my ideas may be received better at the worker level. At the same time, I am progressing into a strong leadership role and have been given high visibility assignments, so I have the attention of some managers that I don’t normally have access to. I plan to use this unique position to promote leadership at every level within my organization.

First, I must be better about challenging mandated approaches if and when I believe they could be supplemented by strategic ideas from the rest of the team. I have to make these challenges around my peers with the hope that doing so will help them gain the courage to speak up as well. In addition, I plan to introduce the coaching style to managers in my organization because I do not believe this concept has ever been understood or practiced up to this point. To accomplish this, I will make a conscious effort to follow the grow model, which uses questioning to enable others to find their own way through the issues they are faced with (Obolensky, 2014).

Resources

George Mason University. Retrieved August 23, 2017 from https://gse.gmu.edu/research/tr/tr-action

Lanng, C. (2015). Here's how to foster leadership on all levels. Entrepreneur. Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/233947

Obolensky, N. (2014). Complex Adaptive Leadership: Embracing Paradox and Uncertainty (2nd ed.). New York, New York: Gower Publishing.
Yates, J. (2017). The leadership manifesto: developing leaders at all levels in 2017. HR Zone. Retrieved from https://www.hrzone.com/talent/development/the-leadership-manifesto-developing-leaders-at-all-levels-in-2017



No comments:

Post a Comment